Note questions

I judge what makes me a good writer when it really comes down to it. Some occasions others may criticise and let me know if I am a good writer to them. Good writing is not measured by the the skills it measured by the abilty to put thought into paper exactly as you think it. Other wise the readers are confused and sometime things arn't clear to the audience. Qualties that are visible in good wirting would have to be clarity. If the work is easy to read and understand then the look of the writing will be good. Another one would be did the writer explain with enough detail. If so the audience reading the paper shouldnt have to ask questions about the context unless there was a deeper meaning. Another would have to be motivation, some times papers tend to come out looking like barf because the writer was to lazy to make it understandable and fragments will be very visible.